BMW-Driver.net Forums banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,664 Posts
What did it bounce of so much for the safety cell built into the car. Bet it will be back on the road, in this country it would seeing some of the heaps being fixed by dodgy garages

 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,707 Posts
Discussion Starter #3
Aparently it went airbourne - hence very few skid marks.

quote:"Sunday morning near Milan a 41 years old man died because he lost control of his car."

accident happened at 256km/h ~157mph, as per the enzo's computer that records all speeds much like an airplane's "black box" flight data recorder

there is speculation as to how it actually happened, but some believe that the rear end steped off the pavement and entered a spin, with some tree/telephone pole hitting in there. others suggest something similar, but ground effects were lost quickly after leaving the road, which would mean no downforce at 155mph (as the enzo has no "traditional" downforce devices i.e. wings/spoilers, so once the car is sufficently off the ground there is no downforece created at all) the car would then spin and roll out of control, with periods of flight until friction with the ground brought the car to a stop. however it is unknow if the driver lost control, or the vehicle failed at this time. it looks like to me that the car slid into a tree/pole sideways and hit into the door (note the driver rear quarter panel looks very good considering) theis caused the monocoque to break, because all force was applied directly to the monocoque itself.

the monocoque should have held up, but this is aparently a reoccuring problem in ferraris (at least the newer ones 355, 360, enzo)

the lack of skidmarks lends to the theory that the car was airborne for some while before stopping

despite some debate this IS an enzo, leaving only 398 left in the world
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
8,664 Posts
If he had some of our parts fitted he wouldn't have the issue with downforce and stability at high speed

 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top